Assessment is a crucial component of faculty work at Highline. Faculty engage in various forms of assessment: of students and their courses, programs, and the college as a whole. The Highline Assessment Committee oversees all of these assessment types at Highline. This page briefly discusses pedagogy and practices related to assessment of students and courses.
Instructors use formative and summative assessments all the time, but it’s important to remember their different purposes:
Formative Assessments help monitor student progress to determine which students are learning various aspects of the course content and how well.
Traits:
Monitors individual student learning.
Occurs during the learning process.
Is low stakes and/or ungraded.
Examples:
Exit ticket with a question about the day's topic.
Hold up a number of fingers to indicate understanding on a topic.
Polling system.
Summative Assessments are used at the end of an instructional lesson, unit, or module to evaluate student learning.
Traits:
Evaluates individual student learning.
Is a product of the learning.
Is always graded (high stakes).
Examples:
Quizzes
Midterm exams
Final projects
Final draft of a paper
Instructors can learn who is struggling and where, allowing opportunities for intervention.
Instructors can make instructional changes prior to the summative assessment.
Students can recognize when they are learning and when they are struggling.
Students can reflect on their efforts and make changes prior to the summative assessment.
More information about assessing Course Learning Outcomes can be found on the Course Design page.
Critical thinking is one of the six Highline core competencies, which, upon successfully completing their courses of study, students will:
“Demonstrate the ability to analyze and summarize complex information, create an argument that acknowledges multiple perspectives, and use reasoning and evidence to draw conclusions.”
This core competency is evaluated using the AAC&U critical thinking VALUE rubric.
Encouraging students to think critically is an element of effective teaching, as qualified by Highline’s college-wide tenure criteria. Section 1, Faculty Effectiveness, states that effective faculty challenge learners intellectually. This includes encouraging students to ask questions, confront limits, recognize complexities, think critically, and challenge assumptions.
Assessment strategy through the lens of academic honesty is certainly a topic faculty everywhere are discussing, in both 2-yr and 4-yr forums and webinars. Here are some specific assessment practices for all course modalities:.
Shuffle quiz questions in Canvas. This prevents two students collaborating – one answering “odd” and one answering “even” questions – and then putting their answers together.
Set Canvas quizzes to display one question at a time (with multiple questions displaying, students can zoom out on their browser and capture a dozen or more questions in a single grab using screen-capture for sharing).
Limit the number of attempts on Canvas. Consider allowing multiple attempts for low-stakes assessments (short quizzes) while allowing one attempt for high-stakes assessments (mid-terms and final exams). Some students may in essence be ‘practicing’ with each attempt they are given.
Create an assessment in Canvas with randomly selected questions from a test bank, making it difficult for students to share answers.
Set a time limit for quizzes on Canvas (but also consider students who may need extra time or have an accommodation – you can give individual students extra time through the Canvas moderate a quiz page. This helps ensure that only students with some familiarity with the content can complete the entire assessment in the time you have set.
Use short answer and essay questions that require critical thinking and creativity.
Mix objective and subjective questions. Weigh essay and short answer questions more than the multiple choice/true false questions.
Offer several “low-stakes” quizzes instead of a single high-point value quiz – many students may not see a payoff for taking the time to look up answers online.
Draw specifically on course content, modules, or lectures: “How was sustainability defined in our Zoom session from Tuesday?”
When writing objective or short answer questions, place them in the context of a specific real-world or industry situation.
List vocabulary words as part of the alternatives to the question, such that the student would need to look up each vocabulary word to determine the answer. Example: Bacterial cell membranes contain: (A) Phospholipids, (B) Glycogens, (C) Phosphates, (D) Enzymes.
Have your multiple sections take their quiz/test for the week all at the same day/time. This minimizes the opportunities for the first students who take the quiz to pass on information about the quiz (or the actual questions themselves!) to their peers.
Pro tip: Have students sign an integrity statement on the exam. Highline’s Canvas Contingency Course for Faculty offers some suggestions on ways to do this.
As the presence of generative AI tools impacts education, teaching practices, including assessment, are changing as well.
The AI Assessment Scale
The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) was originally developed by Mike Perkins, Jasper Roe, Leon Furze and Jason MacVaugh in response to the rapid emergence of generative AI in education. The project began from a concern that students and educators needed a clearer, fairer and more practical basis for understanding when and how AI could be used in formative and summative tasks, and how these could be designed to account for the new GenAI reality. The AIAS has since been further developed through research, institutional implementation, sector feedback and international use.
Workshops and presentation recordings on this topic from previous professional development events at Highline can be found on the Generative AI page.
The Learning & Teaching Library has many books about assessment practices through various lenses: AI, Equity, Online Learning, Ungrading, and more. Browse assessment-related books that you can check out today! Here are a few to start with:
Artze-Vega, Isis, et al. The Norton Guide to Equity-Minded Teaching. W.W. Norton and Company, 2023.
Bertram Gallant, Tricia, and David A. Rettinger. The Opposite of Cheating : Teaching for Integrity in the Age of AI. University of Oklahoma Press, 2025.
Blum, Susan Debra, et al. Ungrading : Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead). First edition., West Virginia University Press, 2020.
Bowen, José Antonio, et al. Teaching with AI : A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2024.
Fisher, Douglas, et al. The Distance Learning Playbook for College & University Instruction : Teaching for Engagement & Impact in Any Setting. Corwin, a SAGE Publishing Company, 2021.
Henning, Gavin, et al., editors. Reframing Assessment to Center Equity : Theories, Models, and Practices. First edition., Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2022.
Honigsfeld, Andrea, et al. From Equity Insights to Action : Critical Strategies for Teaching Multilingual Learners. Corwin, 2022.