This page covers core elements of Course Design: Backward Design, including Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) and assessment; creating Transparent Assignments (using TILT practices); and a note on using copyrighted materials. There are many ways to approach designing courses. These practices are highly recommended from TIDL.
Backward design is like deciding the destination for your vacation, before planning and making your travel arrangements. It’s starting with the end in mind. Too often, instructors decide which content to use in a course, and then try to build their curriculum around that. This leads to students arriving at unintended destinations and thus, assessments that can’t measure student learning. Backward Design is done in three steps:
Student-centered CLOs are statements of what a student should be able to do that demonstrates the knowledge and skills they’ve gained in your course. They represent the enduring understandings students should have upon completing the course. Highline’s Assessment Committee advises that CLOs should:
Contain a performance statement
Be measurable
Be specific
Be concerned with learning (not teaching)
Be related to the end, rather than the means
Outcomes should also be written in a way that ensures all students, including English language learners, can readily understand what is expected of them by the end of the course. The Assessment Committee further explains criteria for student-centered CLOs here, which includes CLO examples.
Activities to support developing clear and effective CLOs:
Here is a short presentation on developing CLOs that can help guide faculty on how to write CLOs that meet all of the above requirements.
Here is an activity to help faculty design CLOs by discerning between enduring understandings and other knowledge that is less essential (adapted from Mark Sample's 2011 article "Teaching for enduring understanding" in the Chronicle of Higher Education.)
1.B. Tools to support crafting specific, measurable, learning-centered CLOs:
In this step, instructors should consider two questions:
What evidence must students provide to demonstrate they have achieved the CLOs?
What assessment methods will allow students to best demonstrate or provide that evidence?
It is crucial that assessments align with and match the stated CLOs. See the alignment Table below for an example of matching assessment to CLO. In addition, the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principle of “multiple means of action and expression” stresses the importance of allowing students to demonstrate their learning in different ways. This is an important equity and accessibility consideration in supporting students of diverse backgrounds.
Instructors can find more resources about assessment on the Assessment Committee website and on the Assessment page of TIDL’s website.
Content and instruction come last in backward design. Now that the CLOs and assessment methods have been established, instructors have a clear path forward to design content and learning experiences that will lead to the desired results. Instructors should consider:
What do students already know? And what knowledge (even imperfect) will students bring to the course?
What knowledge, skills, and abilities will students need to learn to perform effectively and achieve desired CLOs?
What relevant practice and scaffolds will help solidify the knowledge, skills, and abilities?
To be relevant, the practice and scaffolding should match the CLO expectation. For example, if a CLO requires a student to properly install a LAN or solve quadratic equations, then at some point, they should have practiced LAN installation or solving equations.
Instructors can complete an alignment table (example left, Highline login required) to ensure that students have adequate and relevant opportunities to learn, interact with, and practice the very knowledge, skills and/or abilities called for by the stated CLO.
As generative AI tools evolve and become more available, faculty continue to ask questions about whether or not to incorporate gen AI into their teaching, and if so, how? At the 2026 Spring Faculty Showcase, English faculty member Monica Lemoine gave a presentation AI-Friendly or AI-Free? A Two-Track Course Model Based on Student Choice to share about her two-track course model that gives students the choice about whether they want to engage with gen AI in their learning.
Transparency in Learning and Teaching (TILT) aims to advance equitable teaching and learning practices that reduce systemic inequities in higher education. The TILT Higher Ed resources page helps faculty, educational developers, and administrators to apply the Transparency Framework.
Designing transparent assignments aims to frame assignments in a way so that all students can begin their work at the same starting point and with a shared understanding of what good work should look like. This practice is particularly effective for students from systemically marginalized populations.
Transparent assignments outline for students three important aspects of the assignment (Winkelmes, 2017):
Purpose: The purpose specifies the skills students will practice and the knowledge they will gain, and the long-term relevance of these to the students in their lives or their disciplines
Task: What specific steps will the student follow, from the first step all the way through until they are ready to turn in the assignment
Criteria: What excellence looks like – giving students an opportunity to evaluate real-world work samples by applying a checklist or rubric
TILT's Transparent Assignment Design Template can be used as a guide for developing transparent assignments.
The Highline College Library's Copyright Library Guide provides copyright information along with details about fair use and ways to learn more about copyright. There’s also a Copyright FAQ section which lists some of the most common questions HC colleagues ask about copyright along with suggestions for thinking through those questions.
Many books in the Learning & Teaching Library address aspects of Course Design for a variety of subject disciplines and teaching modalities. Here are a few to start with.
Addy, Tracie Marcella, et al. What Inclusive Instructors Do : Principles and Practices for Excellence in College Teaching. Routledge, 2023.
Burgstahler, Sheryl. Creating Inclusive Learning Opportunities in Higher Education : A Universal Design Toolkit. Harvard Education Press, 2020.
Burgstahler, Sheryl, and Rebecca Cory, editors. Universal Design in Higher Education : From Principles to Practice. Harvard Education Press, 2008.
Hogan, Kelly A., and Viji Sathy. Inclusive Teaching : Strategies for Promoting Equity in the College Classroom. First edition., West Virginia University Press, 2022.
Ludwig, Lewis D., and Todd Zakrajsek. The Science of Learning Meets AI : A Practical Faculty Guide to Purposeful Integration, Student Engagement, and Ethical Practice. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2026. (see Part 2: Building a Foundation for Learning, pp. 43-116)
Tobin, Thomas J., and Kirsten Behling. Reach Everyone, Teach Everyone : Universal Design for Learning in Higher Education. First edition., West Virginia University Press, 2018.
Wiggins, Grant P., and Jay McTighe. Understanding by Design. Expanded 2nd ed., Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2005. (Online access only, see Chapter 1: Backward Design, pp. 13-34)